The original version of this Article contained an error in the third sentence of the results subsection“AM-induced bias persists when not all causal variants are measured” which incorrectly read“in simulated data that randomly dropped π = 0, 50, or 75% of all p= 106 variants, including both causal (m = 104) and non-causal (p−m = 990,000) SNPs (Fig. 4)”. The correct version refers to“Fig. 3b” instead of“Fig. 4”. This has been corrected in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.