Document Type

Article

Publication Date

2018

Publication Title

Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics

ISSN

1680-7316

Volume

18

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-735-2018

Abstract

We present top-down constraints on global monthly N2O emissions for 2011 from a multi-inversion approach and an ensemble of surface observations. The inversions employ the GEOS-Chem adjoint and an array of aggregation strategies to test how well current observations can constrain the spatial distribution of global N2O emissions. The strategies include (1) a standard 4D-Var inversion at native model resolution (4° × 5°), (2) an inversion for six continental and three ocean regions, and (3) a fast 4D-Var inversion based on a novel dimension reduction technique employing randomized singular value decomposition (SVD). The optimized global flux ranges from 15.9 Tg N yr−1 (SVD-based inversion) to 17.5–17.7 Tg N yr−1 (continental-scale, standard 4D-Var inversions), with the former better capturing the extratropical N2O background measured during the HIAPER Pole-to-Pole Observations (HIPPO) airborne campaigns. We find that the tropics provide a greater contribution to the global N2O flux than is predicted by the prior bottom-up inventories, likely due to underestimated agricultural and oceanic emissions. We infer an overestimate of natural soil emissions in the extratropics and find that predicted emissions are seasonally biased in northern midlatitudes. Here, optimized fluxes exhibit a springtime peak consistent with the timing of spring fertilizer and manure application, soil thawing, and elevated soil moisture. Finally, the inversions reveal a major emission underestimate in the US Corn Belt in the bottom-up inventory used here. We extensively test the impact of initial conditions on the analysis and recommend formally optimizing the initial N2O distribution to avoid biasing the inferred fluxes. We find that the SVD-based approach provides a powerful framework for deriving emission information from N2O observations: by defining the optimal resolution of the solution based on the information content of the inversion, it provides spatial information that is lost when aggregating to political or geographic regions, while also providing more temporal information than a standard 4D-Var inversion.

Comments

Kelley C. Wells1, Dylan B. Millet1, Nicolas Bousserez2, Daven K. Henze2, Timothy J. Griffis1, Sreelekha Chaliyakunnel1, Edward J. Dlugokencky3, Eri Saikawa4, Gao Xiang5, Ronald G. Prinn6, Simon O'Doherty7, Dickon Young7, Ray F. Weiss8, Geoff S. Dutton3,9, James W. Elkins3, Paul B. Krummel10, Ray Langenfelds10, and L. Paul Steele10

1Department of Soil, Water, and Climate, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA
2Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA
3Earth System Research Laboratory, NOAA, Boulder, CO, USA
4Department of Environmental Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
5Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
6Center for Global Change Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
7School of Chemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
8Scripps Institute of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
9CIRES, University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA
10Climate Science Centre, CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere, Aspendale, Victoria, Australia


Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Share

COinS