Document Type

Article

Publication Date

11-1-2016

Publication Title

Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics

ISSN

1680-7316

Volume

16

Issue

21

First Page

13579

Last Page

13599

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-13579-2016

Abstract

In the Hemispheric Transport of Air Pollution Phase 2 (HTAP2) exercise, a range of global atmospheric general circulation and chemical transport models performed coordinated perturbation experiments with 20 % reductions in emissions of anthropogenic aerosols, or aerosol precursors, in a number of source regions. Here, we compare the resulting changes in the atmospheric load and vertically resolved profiles of black carbon (BC), organic aerosols (OA) and sulfate (SO4) from 10 models that include treatment of aerosols. We use a set of temporally, horizontally and vertically resolved profiles of aerosol forcing efficiency (AFE) to estimate the impact of emission changes in six major source regions on global radiative forcing (RF) pertaining to the direct aerosol effect, finding values between. 51.9 and 210.8 mW m−2 Tg−1 for BC, between −2.4 and −17.9 mW m−2 Tg−1 for OA and between −3.6 and −10.3 W m−2 Tg−1 for SO4. In most cases, the local influence dominates, but results show that mitigations in south and east Asia have substantial impacts on the radiative budget in all investigated receptor regions, especially for BC. In Russia and the Middle East, more than 80 % of the forcing for BC and OA is due to extra-regional emission reductions. Similarly, for North America, BC emissions control in east Asia is found to be more important than domestic mitigations, which is consistent with previous findings. Comparing fully resolved RF calculations to RF estimates based on vertically averaged AFE profiles allows us to quantify the importance of vertical resolution to RF estimates. We find that locally in the source regions, a 20 % emission reduction strengthens the radiative forcing associated with SO4 by 25 % when including the vertical dimension, as the AFE for SO4 is strongest near the surface. Conversely, the local RF from BC weakens by 37 % since BC AFE is low close to the ground. The fraction of BC direct effect forcing attributable to intercontinental transport, on the other hand, is enhanced by one-third when accounting for the vertical aspect, because long-range transport primarily leads to aerosol changes at high altitudes, where the BC AFE is strong. While the surface temperature response may vary with the altitude of aerosol change, the analysis in the present study is not extended to estimates of temperature or precipitation changes.

Comments

Frank Dentener5, Louisa Emmons6, Johannes Flemming8, Amund Søvde Haslerud1, Daven Henze4, Jan Eiof Jonson7, Tom Kucsera9, Marianne Tronstad Lund1, Michael Schulz7, Kengo Sudo10, Toshihiko Takemura11, and Simone Tilmes6

1CICERO Center for International Climate and Environmental Research, Oslo, Norway
2Goddard Earth Sciences and Technology Center, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA
3Earth Sciences Division, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA
4Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA
5European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and Sustainability, Ispra (VA), Italy
6Atmospheric Chemistry Division, National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR), CO, USA
7Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Oslo, Norway
8European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecast (ECMWF), Reading, UK
9Universities Space Research Association, Greenbelt, MD, USA
10Nagoya University, Furocho, Chigusa-ku, Nagoya, Japan
11Research Institute for Applied Mechanics, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan

Share

COinS