Kenneth N. Bickers
The established literature on voter behavior suggests that voting typologies can be generally deﬁned as follows: (1) voters participating in all elections, (2) voters participating in state and federal elections only, (3) voters participating only in federal elections, and (4) voters participating only in presidential elections. My thesis investigates whether there are some voters who fall outside of these established voting typologies and focus their civic eﬀorts towards nonpartisan or local issues elections. Utilizing data from the Ohio Secretary of State, I used Q methodology factor analysis to distinguish voter types. While I was unable to establish a local-specialist voter type, I was able to ﬁnd groups of biennial federal specialists and habitual voters. Using hypotheses for the characteristics local specialists might have in common, I performed multivariate regression analysis to explain the diﬀerence between these federal specialists and the habitual voters who participated in local elections. I found that the habitual voters tend to be less partisan and from more rural counties, and turnout more often when elections have tax issues on the ballot and less often when elections have bond issues on the ballot. I found no indications that these habitual voters tend to be older or have specializations in local or miscellaneous issues (as deﬁned by the Ohio Secretary of State).
Milby, Zachariah, "Voter Specialization in Local Elections" (2013). Undergraduate Honors Theses. 443.