-------------------
GENERAL INFORMATION
-------------------


1. Title of Dataset:  Dataset of articles prcosessed as part of the manuscript "Defining and conceptualizing equity and justice in climate adaptation"

2. Authors: Walker, SE, Smith, EA, Bennett, N, Bannister, E, Narayana, A, Nuckols, T, Pineda Velez,
K., Wrigley, J, Bailey, KM

3. Contact information: Jordan Wrigley, study methodologist and data analyst, jeliwrig@gmail.com

4. Date of data collection: Search run May 2022

5. Keywords: Climate Change, Adaptation, Equity, Justice, Scoping Review, Interdisciplinary, Conceptual Framing


--------------------------
SHARING/ACCESS INFORMATION
-------------------------- 

1. Licenses/restrictions placed on the data: CC-BY

2. Links to publications that cite or use the data: FORTHCOMING

3. Links to other publicly accessible locations of the data: NONE

---------------------
DATA & FILE OVERVIEW
---------------------

1. File List:

   A. Filename: Climate_Adaptation_datset_README.txt

   B. Filename: Final_included_articles.csv
	- CSV file of metadata for the final included results of the review.

   C. Filename: Title_abstract_irrelevant_articles.csv
	- CSV file of metadata for articles deemed irrelavant based on study criteria applied to the titles and abstracts of the articles.

   D. Filename: Full_text_excluded_articles.csv
	- CSV file of metadata for articles that were excluded based on criteria applied to the reports of articles during the full text screening 	process.
   
   E. Filename: All_articles_deduplicated.xlsx
	- File has a filtering option to see reasons for exclusion or in alphabetical or chronological order. Results that did not have associated metadata 	were not included in this file.  

   F. Filename: Search_translation_report.txt
	- A text file of all search blocks, hedges, and filter used in this process in each database.    

--------------------------
DATA ELEMENTS
--------------------------
Tile - Article title
Authors	- Article authors
Abstract - Article abstract
Published Year - Year of article publication
Published Month	- Month of article publication
Journal	- Journal name
Volume - Volume of article
Issue - Issue of article
Pages - Pages of article
Accession Number - Database accession number
DOI - Digital Object Identifier 
Ref - Reference download number
Covidence # - Covidence article number/identifier
Study - Associated study (if seperate from article manuscript)
Notes - Note added by screening team, including reasons for exclusion
Tags - Information added by screening team in forma of short tags for future reference (ex. a tag of "lit review"would designate a article that may have been useful in the background section whether included or excluded.)


--------------------------
METHODOLOGICAL INFORMATION
--------------------------

We conducted a scoping review in concordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. We searched the following databases: Dimensions (via CU Boulder subscription), Environment Complete (via EBSCO), Social Sciences Full Text (via EBSCO), Web of Science (via Clarivate). The search was conducted by a professional systematic review informationist and included a mix of keywords and subject headings representing ‘climate adaptation’, ‘climate mitigation’, ‘equity/inequity’, ‘justice/injustice’, and others. The search had no time limitations and was completed in May 2022. Articles were limited to those written in English language. Studies that were not published in academic journals were excluded. Reproducible search strategies can be found associated with this record [Search_translation_report.txt] or in the Supplemental Materials on the publisher website.

The searches yielded a total of 6031 citations across all the utilized databases. All citations were imported into the online screening platform Covidence (Cochrane) via EndNote (Clarivate). Duplicate citations (n=712) were automatically identified and removed by Covidence. Each article was independently screened by two reviewers during each stage of the screening process. A team of four reviewers screened references by title and abstract removing irrelevant articles that did not align with screening criteria (n=4509) [Title_abstract_irrelevant_articles.csv]. Table 1 outlines this screening criteria. All disagreements were adjudicated by a third reiewer. Full-text articles (n=801) were screened by a team of five reviewers using the same criteria used for title and abstract screening and again, all disagreements were adjudicated by a third reviewer. The full-text screening excluded 485 studies [Full_text_excluded_articles.csv], leaving 316 [Final_included_articles.csv] studies included in our review. Before both screening phases, ll reviewers pilot screened approximately 38 articles to reach a Fleiss’ kappa value of 0.79. Study selection is presented in a PRISMA flowchart.